What can replace a metal coagulant in water treatment processes?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Prepare for the TCEQ Class B Surface Water License Test with practice questions, detailed explanations, and study materials. Enhance your water management skills and get ready for your certification exam!

In water treatment processes, replacing metal coagulants often involves selecting an alternative that can effectively destabilize colloidal particles and promote flocculation. Cationic polymers are suitable substitutes for metal coagulants because they carry a positive charge, which helps neutralize the negative charge on suspended particles in water. This interaction facilitates the aggregation of particles, leading to the formation of larger flocs that can be easily removed from the water.

Cationic polymers are particularly beneficial in situations where traditional metal coagulants, such as aluminum or ferric salts, may lead to issues like increased residuals or pH fluctuations. By using cationic polymers, operators can achieve similar or even improved turbidity removal while often providing benefits like lower sludge volume and better settling characteristics.

In contrast, anionic polymers are negatively charged and would not provide the necessary charge neutralization required for effective coagulation. Silica gel, while useful in certain filtration processes, does not have the same coagulation properties as metal coagulants or cationic polymers. Sodium sulfate, being a salt, does not play an effective role in the coagulation process and typically does not contribute to the destabilization of charged particles in water. Therefore, cationic polymers stand out as the

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy